Government business and courtesy calls

Government business, as could be expected, can be expansive. There are those strategic meetings that could travel deep into the night to plot serious development strategies; there are the regular cabinet meetings to discuss serious national issues and the usual workshops, seminars and conferences which are used as platforms by government officials to open the lid on government policies and programmes and use the same to receive feedbacks and to test the effectiveness of government business. It is to facilitate government business that various ministries have been created, both the traditional ones and those created at the fancy of every new government, alongside the departments and agencies of state to tackle defined sectors of national development. The presidency, which is the pinnacle and nerve-centre of government, must by necessity assume the characteristics of all the ministries, departments and agencies combined. Apart from attending to all the businesses mentioned earlier, the seat of government is also a target for various interest groups who believe that the best and most effective way of getting attention and receiving recognition is to present themselves at the The Castle, formerly, and now Flagstaff House. Among the groups are foreign delegations of business people all claiming to be investors who have the magic wand for our never-healthy economy, diplomats, social groups, religious bodies, chiefs and old schoolmates. Some of the objectives of the visiting delegations can be as mundane as going to wish the President well and to congratulate him on his elevation to the highest office of the land. Others go to announce the death of a chief or someone who in the estimation of the bereaved family was an important national figure whose demise must be announced to the President personally. I have never set eyes on the daily routine of a President but I can hazard one. The day will usually begin with a security briefing on the state of the nation and where there are possible security threats to the nation. The President will also receive a situation report (Sitrep) from the Chief of Staff and quickly go through the confidential mails from the Special Care or Confidential Registry before checking the diary for the day’s scheduled assignments which would inevitably include meetings, receiving visiting delegations and possibly attending out-of-office programmes such as delivering speeches at workshops, seminars and conferences, and using those opportunities to market the government on its policies, plans, programmes and achievements. On a normal day, by the time the President finishes his day’s schedule of assignments, the day would have come to an end and he would have had very little time to spend some critical moments to think of serious problems confronting the nation. If the daily schedule, as I guessed here, remains a regular feature of the presidency, it means the President will for most of the time be receiving delegations, delivering speeches, most of which would not necessarily represent his thoughts or ideas, but flowing from pens of speechwriters, among them government propagandists who have very little time to reflect soberly on national problems. Under the circumstances, the President of the Republic will be relying mostly on the briefings by his ministers and party apparatchik without necessarily making independent assessment of the situation on the ground. No doubt, with all the lofty plans and the sweet things we have been fed with most of the time, this country is still trapped in poverty, joblessness and misery. Not too strange is the fact that there is a vast gap between what our governments tell us they want to do and what they end up doing. If government machinery is functioning effectively, the presidency should be the last resort and this will reduce considerably the traffic to the Flagstaff House. The ministries, departments and agencies should be able to take a lot of the workload from the shoulders of the presidency and leave it to concentrate on serious government business. The regional and district coordinating councils should be able to function in such a way that people with grievances do not have to travel to Accra to the Flagstaff House before getting the assurance that their problems can be addressed. Some of the foreign delegations whether diplomats or business groups should not go beyond ministerial levels. There is no need for a minister of a foreign country visiting Ghana calling on the Vice-President and later calling on the President. Is it because we are so desperate for external support that we do not want to conform to international protocols that allow visiting dignitaries to be received by their equal counterparts? It is obvious that our country is not enjoying the best of health irrespective of what those who are at the centre of power may proclaim and our Executive President, on whose head lay all our problems, should find the time to devise solutions. The presidency must make the work of the ministries and other state institutions easier by restricting visitors to the presidency, limiting it to the most important. We agree that the presidency must be accessible to as many people as possible but that should also mean that there should be schedule officers that could represent the President and take care of most of the visits and leave the President to do more serious things. There is no need for delegations to travel to the presidency to hand an invitation to a traditional festival personally to the President. There is no justification for the President to spend the whole day receiving a funeral delegation when that could be done more conveniently by the regional and district coordinating councils on his behalf. Politically we may think that uncontrolled open-door policy will be yielding dividends but in reality, just like what our free-for-all trade liberalisation has done to our local industries, the practice will only reduce the presidency to a ceremonial one and push serious things into the background. fokofi@yahoo.co.uk kofiakordor.blogspot.com

What others think of us

Diplomats by their training and the nature of their job are very cautious with the choice of words. They hardly say YES or NO to questions and they give praise where it is not due or express cautious optimism even when things look very gloomy. Foreign diplomats who come to this country never fail to tell us all the pleasant things they have heard of Ghana and its people. They tell us we are very friendly and hospitable and that our country is one of the best on the whole continent of Africa. Some go into history and recall the splendid works of our past leaders, especially Dr Kwame Nkrumah, who they admit was a great leader who devoted much of his life fighting for the liberation and unity of Africa. Sometimes in the profusion of their praises, some of them forgot the role their governments played in the past to frustrate the independence of African countries and how they plotted against progressive leaders like Nkrumah to hound them out of office. Diplomats departing the country tell us how beautiful Ghana and its people are. They tell us how we are making progress in the economic and political fields. These days, the additional cliché is, Ghana is the beacon of democracy on the continent. Such sweet words make our leaders very happy, sometimes very proud and take our minds off the gloom surrounding us. Diplomats by tradition are not expected to tell us the truth, at least not when they are on our soil but God knows the confidential information they feed their governments with in the comfort of their offices. Classified information made public by WikiLeaks on various governments including that of Ghana about two years ago was just a small indication of what people say about us in public and what they think of us in reality. When we cast the sweet words of diplomacy aside, African countries do not conjure any positive image in the minds of many in the international arena. Ours is a picture of misery, poverty, disease, ignorance and corrupt leadership. If truth must be told, we need to make a sober reflection to determine whether we deserve the praises being heaped on us or whether the gloom being painted about the continent is a true reflection of state of affairs on the continent. At independence, the first president of the republic, Dr Nkrumah, set a high for the Black race and vowed to prove that what others could do, Africans and for that matter Blacks could do better. He set a cracking pace on all fronts and it became obvious that if that momentum was sustained for appreciable length of time, that pledge to redeem Ghana from political and economic bondage was going to be a reality. Things did not work the way we expected and as we prepare to celebrate 56 years of independence, the question on the lips of every serious-minded person is, ‘Where is the independence dream?’ The flag and anthem continue to be the symbols of nationhood. Beyond that independence has made limited impact in our national life. We still feel insecure and only regain some level of confidence at the approach of a white-skinned person. In the past, we were looking up to the great economic powers In Europe and the US for salvation. Today, our situation has deteriorated to an extent that we take solace in China, Korea, India and Malaysia. It appears the end is not in sight, and the more we celebrate independence with parades and big speeches, the more we get entangled in the begging syndrome. We are yet to know what we can do for ourselves. We still export our natural resources in their raw form which gives us very little value and import almost everything we need including toothpicks. While others have turned deserts into green fields, we are still at a loss as to how to make use of the abundant water resources at our disposal for agricultural production and other economic ventures. The River Volta alone could have done what the Nile has done for Egypt, but alas, water to drink in our homes let alone for commercial and industrial use has become headaches for us. We are praying for some people from China, India, Brazil and the latest on the block, Turkey or somewhere, to come and fetch water from River Volta into our homes. We cannot as a people get a boat on the Volta Lake for transportation purposes. We cannot exploit the enormous tourism potential of the Volta Lake and change the economy of this country for the better. What diplomats for purposes of their profession would not tell us, the social media on the Internet have made freely available. Just type in an African country and the truth about us would be staring at you. Hopeless people who are always complaining of hunger when they have some of the best lands on the planet. Talk of lack of funds and the social media will tell us how useless we are, always begging others, when our politicians are the most corrupt, stashing away national revenue in foreign banks, investing in grandiose properties overseas, while their citizens languish in poverty. There is a new lobby emerging in the US and Europe which many may not be aware. There are many in those places who are making a strong case against handouts from their countries to Africa. They claim the continent’s problems have very little to do with inadequate resources. They have identified lack of imagination and bad, uninspired and corrupt leadership and, therefore, could not carry the burden of Africa any longer. The Asians have started cashing in and would continue to do so until they have had their fill and left us in our misery. The solution is nowhere but here. We need to change our mindset that without others we cannot make it. The tendency to find excuse for our failures in lack of funds must end. As the saying goes, we need to pull ourselves by our own bootstraps if we are to make ourselves relevance on the international stage. fokofi@yahoo.co.uk kofiakordor.blogspot.com

Making mockery of the law

There was this interesting case of a police corporal who effected the arrest of a suspect. While going through the process of preparing the suspect for court, pressure was brought upon him from various quarters to drop the case. Despite pressures from friends and relatives of the suspect, including some powerful and influential members of society, the corporal remained adamant and preferred to stick to the principles and dictates of his profession. The following day, while on duty at the charge office, the corporal saw some men in flowing robes and suits requesting to see the district commander. Not quite long, the district commander invited him to his office and ordered him to come along with the case file on the suspect. Minutes later, the visitors came down the stairs and waved at him smiling. That was the end of the matter. In police parlance, they say docket closed, case die. The police corporal who was doing his work according to the demands of the law, did not only feel humiliated but seriously deflated. Naturally, he swore never to make himself an object of ridicule again. Since he is at the frontline of criminal cases, your guess is as good as mine. This is not an isolated case. If you are very close to the men and women in uniform, you will hear a lot of such cases where police efforts to bring suspects to justice were thwarted by men and women in authority, who in one breadth tout the supremacy of the law and in another frustrate the law enforcement agencies in their work. It appears the law only works in one direction – of those who do not have a title or have any close associate with a title. The law enforcement agencies, the police in particular, have attracted the ire of the general public for ineptitude, inaction and corruption. Many even blame the high level of indiscipline prevailing in the country on the inefficient and ineffective performance of the law enforcement agencies, which the police form a pivotal part. While the police and other law enforcement agencies cannot escape blame for the national situation, many may not believe that officialdom has created the platform for even those who are prepared to discharge their duties to get frustrated and in extreme cases join the bandwagon in corrupt practices. When junior officers and the other ranks realise that their superior officers will play ball and allow suspects to go scot free they will not hesitate to collect their fair share of the bribe money: That is the national problem confronting us now. This was the point that was brought to the fore by Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCO) Mr Kofi Danso Adei Acheampong, the Upper West Regional Police Commander, when he spoke at a forum on security and fire safety in Wa a week ago. The police officer spoke about the harm influential personalities who interfere in the work of the police are causing the country. Such interferences do not only embolden criminals. They also undermine the justice system of the country and discourage personnel of the security agencies and lower their morale. They also afford the bad lots the excuse to do the wrong things under the guise of obeying orders from above. Not too long ago, a popular musician was arrested for obstructing a police officer from performing his duty. Not only that. She assaulted the officer and tore his official uniform. This was a case which offered the opportunity to establish the sanctity and authority of the police as the nation's number one law enforcer. Strangely the case went into a kind of hibernation and when it was brought back to life after a long adjournment, there was a settlement and the suspect went free with a token fine which was readily paid without a wink. This cannot be a motivation for dedicated service to the nation, neither can it serve as a deterrent to others and establish the fact that this is not a lawless country and that the law will take its full course no matter whose ox is gored. Just last week, a Ghanaian actor, Kofi Adu, aka Agya, Koo was in the news for allegedly collecting various sums of money from some people with the promise to secure US visa for them. One of his clients who paid the US visa as far back as March 8, 2011 got fed up with the hide-and-seek antics of Agya Koo and reported the matter to the police. Agya Koo was arrested and charged among others, for defrauding under false pretences. We were waiting patiently expecting that the law would take its course and if the accused is proved guilty, suffer the penalty accordingly. When Agya Koo appeared before an Accra Circuit Court, he did not deny collecting those monies. Strangely, in the end, the court decided to act as a debt collector by asking the accused to refund the money and not even with interest. Agya Koo refunded the money and left the court a free person. Can we turn round and exact severe penalties on others with similar offences? Can we penalise any person who purchases an item with fake currency and comes to tell a court that he/she made a mistake and so was prepared to withdraw the fake currency and replace it with genuine currency to end the matter? We have all the laws a country needs to ensure sanity and order for its people but none of them seems to be working because right from the word go, influential people and those in authority who must ensure that the law works are ready to bend the rules to their selfish advantage. Mr Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the former head of the International Monetary Fund, would not have found himself where he is now, if the laws were not working or if they only swung in favour of the rich and famous. On May 15, 2011, Strauss-Kahn was arrested by the New York Police over allegations of sexual assault following a complaint lodged by a hotel worker. That cost him his position as the Managing Director of the world money-lending body when he tendered in his official resignation on May 18, 2011. The arrest also put to rest, his ambition to contest for the presidency of France. Can we allow the law to work in the same vein in our country? For now, there is no evidence that we are prepared to allow the law to take its course. Until we do that we cannot but contend with a lawless society where justice at best goes to the highest bidder. fokofi@yahoo.co.uk kofiakordor.blogspot.com